The following essay analyzes, synthesizes, and expounds upon two articles appertaining to the variable criteria requisite to enter major Literature's exclusive Canon, and the need for its reform.

The reasons that certain literary works become masterpieces, and are embraced and extolled, others receive encomium for a certain period of time and then fall into disfavor, and still others are seen as loathing and contemptible pieces of garbage are not always completely clear. However, Jane Tompkins cogently shows, through systematic example and analysis, that the decision is not an arbitrary one, nor is it a result of some endemic attribute, some divine quality that …

…language. It is perhaps unrealistic to expect a language so far removed from prevailing expectations to have any credibility, and it is difficult to use that language to create solidarity and establish equality. Perhaps a middle of the road approach is best, where compromises are made and new language is slowly added until it is inextricably intertwined with and redefines the oppressive language of society. Works Cited Richter, David. Falling Into Theory. Bedford/St. Martin's 2000.